Until I was asked to work on the LOTR/Hobbit cake, I haven’t really done much creatively or artistically for quite some time. I just haven’t had the push or the drive to do so. The rare times I considered working on something, I found a way to talk myself out of it or to convince myself it wasn’t worth the time or the effort. Continue reading “Finding My Creative Groove Again”
I thought I’d come close this year to hitting last year’s reading numbers and I got kind of close. I’m glad I didn’t actually read that many because I really kind of felt like a bit of slacker when I saw 2014s numbers. Continue reading “2015 Review”
From now until the end of the year, my time is going to be spent immersed in family time and traditions so I’ll have little to no time to devote to reading, let alone writing about it. I wish you all a beautiful beginning of winter and all the joy that comes with it.
This post has been pestering me for a while, but I’ve struggled to get it written because there are just so many different things to say and ways to say it that its hard to narrow it down below a novel level. I initially thought this would be more about authors’ writing styles and creation processes or about character building and development or what makes a great writer stand out from just a good writer, but you have to note all of those things and more to really get to the meat of the subject.
Almost all of my reading material comes from the library, usually Kindle or ePub versions and only a very few am I willing to spend money on from my limited book buying budget. Those are books written by authors that have proven time and time again to be exactly what I love and crave in a great story. If I bought every book I wanted to read, I’d read myself right into the poorhouse, so I only buy what I know I’m going to love.
I have found that I like a pretty large variety of subjects and genres (all within the fiction realm) when it comes to reading, but I rarely love anything to the point where I know I’m going to read it over and over again. It takes an extremely special and unique combination set of things to push any book near that coveted Favorite rating for me. I will give a book a 5 star/Excellent rating, but it still won’t make it onto my Favorites list but even that is a pretty rare occurrence.
If you look at that list, I have quite a few, but in comparison to the total number of books I’ve read over the years, it is an extremely small percentage. What there is is almost exclusively books that fall into the Fantasy genre. I really do love a great book that involves the impossible, magic and shifters and worlds that are not the one we live in. Where people are capable of things that we can only dream about. There are a crap ton of books out there that have all those things in their stories, but the ones that are truly awesome are the ones that are capable of making all that impossible real.
I’ve read a handful of interview questions or FAQs from a variety of different authors over the years and I noticed something that seems to be a common thread among my all time favorite authors that doesn’t appear to be there for authors that don’t make that list. That is that their characters are real to them. They have lives. They have opinions. They have discussions with the author. They will have an all out hissy fit if the author tries to push them in a direction the character doesn’t want to go. They are, in essence, real. In just about any other group of the population, if someone said that they have voices talking in their heads they’d end up medicated and in a hospital somewhere.
At one point, I kind of thought that was some serious crazy talk until I was forced to understand it after making several custom pieces for clients that, while not quite so out and out words and conversations with me, had some seriously strong opinions as to what they were going to be. I finally, really, truly got it at that point because those ended up being not only some of my favorite pieces, but some of my best.
I’ve compared authors to artists before and that is what they are, their medium is the written word instead of paint or clay or metal or some other physical, tangible medium. Like musicians use notes and instruments, writers use words to paint their pictures and the most talented ones pull you so thoroughly into their pictures that you are living them right beside the characters. It isn’t just characters, though. Those are vivid, vibrant, deeply layered and complex beings that you know exist even if they really don’t. The worlds they live in are just as rich and cultivated that, as a reader, there is very little need to truly imagine it because it has been painted is such detail it is hard to miss. When I read a book, that is what I want. I want the full experience. I want all of my senses engaged, not just my eyes and my imagination.
It has been something of an unofficial goal this year to find at least one new author to add to my Favorites list. I have yet to find one because there are so very few that seem to write to that level that I’m looking for. So many authors write for quantity rather than quality and there are so very many that are cookie cutter or formula writers that it is amazing there are any decent books at all. They aren’t awful writers at all, don’t get me wrong. They just are the bare effort, riding on previous success writers that aren’t willing to put in the extra needed to make something great. They are okay with just being okay.
I can’t begin to tell you how many books I’ve read that were so obviously in that cookie cutter/formula crowd. The first book or two by an author you read, you may not notice and it is easy to think that you might have found something good, but then you read a few more and realize how wrong you are. At one point, I actually watched my percentage mark as I read and found that the author I was reading literally had points where certain things had to happen in their story. 20% would have the first sexual event, 50% would have say some major drama point, 80% would have the big misunderstanding/breakup/separation and 90% would have the miraculous make-up and lets live happily ever after before the end of the book. The only real differences would be the basic specifics like names, places personalities and scenario details. It was like reading some plug and play book. Ever since then (and after having something similar happen several more times), I’ve become leery of reading what I call bulk authors. Again comparing to other types of art, it is like seeing mass produced costume jewelry sitting next to a custom, handmade piece. You are going to notice a difference.
While I get hugely frustrated that my favorite authors don’t produce at a higher rater, I’m also extremely glad that they don’t because that means I’m still going to get awesome when they do put something new out. It usually takes time to produce something amazing. Look at pregnancy and gourmet cooking and gemstones like diamonds, they don’t come quick and easy. Like fast food and quick meals, as a reader I’ll read those mass produced authors because I like to read and sometimes something that isn’t quite so full and rich is called for, but that doesn’t mean those will ever be read more than once or earn a spot on the Favorites list. I will keep looking as I do want a broader range of authors I wait rather impatiently for new material, the ones I’m willing to spend my very limited buying budget on. The rest, I’ll see you at the library during those long waits.
Reading Heaven and Hell, by Kristen Ashly opened my eyes to something that has been bugging me with the last several KA books I’ve read. It took a while because I couldn’t quite put my finger on it, but with this book, I finally figured it out.
While she writes these amazing, badass alpha males, they are all pretty chauvinistic. It is most often done in such a way that they are still damn hot and sexy, which is one of the things that kept bugging me because I don’t find that kind of behavior sexy. There are parts of all of these alpha males that I absolutely adore, but a lot of times, that gets pushed to the side because of the attitude. The female characters also have their own issues that I don’t normally like and how they act and respond to those alpha males really emphasizes that chauvinism.
When taken as a whole, the majority of female characters in KA books, while spunky, quirky and, on the surface, pretty cool, they are also most often the stereotypical heroine that ultimately needs someone to take care of her and rescue her. They also often seem like they are bordering shallow and flighty. No matter what strengths she may have, she is rendered weak when put up against these serious alpha males. They talk over the female characters, are almost always right and have some reasonable, rational, logical response to every concern that the females may raise, making them seem irrational, over reacting, or even bitchy and that makes those thoughts, feelings or concerns seem frivolous.
As a standard (and there are exceptions to every rule), the female characters are the ones to compromise or give in. Heaven and Hell is a good example of that as really the only compromise the male character allows in the entire story is the biggie in the end. Sure, it is huge and important, but the smaller, every day compromises are just as important as the biggies. Again, not always, but so often these books seem to be carried on the solid personality of the alphas, even if they are chauvinistic, and only a bit on the quirky of the females. There just aren’t that many female characters that come across as truly strong.
This creates a power imbalance in the relationships between the male and female characters. Not once have I read a KA book where there is a true balancing of that power. When it comes to the “man’s world” aspects of the relationships it is always the man’s way or the highway with zero room for compromise. I am not usually a fan of this huge divide between men and women in romance. I see no reason why you can’t have these amazing, protective alpha males that still balance and support the strengths of the females, making them stronger instead of making them seem weak and unable to stand alone while also not emasculating or lessening the power of that alpha male because she would in turn balance and support him.
So why is it that I have, and still mostly do, love Kristen Ashley? In a lot of ways, it isn’t the characters, as I’ve seen often enough, there are lots of aspects that I don’t like about her characters, yet I still love them. It is the way she writes them, infusing them with huge, gut snagging emotions that make them so incredibly real. The histories she wraps those characters in and the fact that they are so far from perfect they can only be human makes it impossible not to connect with them.
It is because of the realism and beauty that she manages to weave into every story that I keep coming back and why I still love the stories even if I don’t always love the characters or what they represent which kind of makes me hate that I like them in the first place. There is such a uniqueness to her style and how she writes that just draws you in no matter what. That is kind of difficult for me to understand. How can I love a story but not so much the characters, even sometimes when I feel like the story may be missing something? It doesn’t seem rational or logical, but it just is.
The last several KA books that I’ve read have been really difficult for me to rate and review because there are quite a few things that I love and hate about them so it is incredibly hard to figure out where it falls in the grand scheme of things. I’d have to say that I’d still rate Kristen Ashley as my favorite romance author because what she writes always hits strong. I’d even say that a few of her characters are some of my favorites, but I don’t actually like her characters (at least parts of them) most of the time.
It’s kind of crazy, but even with the things that I’m not such a fan of, I’ve yet to find another romance author that I like they way I do Kristen Ashley. It would be beyond awesome to get the kinds of characters I know I’d love wrapped up in the kinds of stories KA writes, they way she writes, but that is probably expecting something like perfection and not even our favorite authors are capable of that.
Most everyone has preferences when it comes to reading. Those may be the genres and subgenres they lean towards, paperback/hardcover vs. ebook, specific authors or even writing styles. Another big preference potential is male or female authors.
Male and female authors very often write from differing or even contrasting world views. As I mentioned in a previous post on perspectives, readers bring their life experiences into what they read. Authors do the same thing when writing a book. Since men and women have very different struggles and obstacles in their lives, their base level life experiences are going to be different, so how they approach the stories and characters they create are also going to be different.
It has been my experience that, as a woman, I struggle to connect with books that are written by male authors. I can absolutely enjoy them and appreciate the artistry that is behind those stories, but I have yet to find a male author that inspires me to be watching impatiently for their next book release.
I have found that books written by male authors (though I must say that my sampling is on the narrow end and really only range in a few genres) tend to focus more on action than emotion. The big, exciting parts of those books fall heavily into that range. When there is an emotional context, it is often times harder to actually grasp the emotion the author is trying to impart because it comes from a different perspective than mine. It is also more of a punctuation to different points of their stories rather than a threaded part of the cohesive whole.
A female author tends to have that emotional thread underlying and permeating everything. When a reader sees a character developing, that character’s thoughts, actions and personality is woven in along with their feelings about themselves and everyone around them. This applies to male and female characters.
Male and female authors usually portray their male and female characters differently. What a woman sees as important or appealing aspects to her male and female characters is often going to be different than what a man sees for those same characters. While both tend to either overtly or subtly objectify the opposite sex in their characters, women are more likely to emphasize non-physical or imperfect physical traits in their characters. I think that they are also more willing to place both women and men on equal or at least balanced footing.
Author Kim Harrison posted similar thoughts on male vs. female author character representation on her FB page.
There will always be exceptions to every rule, but in the broader spectrum, these generalities tend to run true from what I’ve noticed. I can admit that I’m biased here as I prefer a female author and often will skip even reading the blurbs of books that are obviously written by male authors. I know that I have a better chance of connecting to how the female authors have written their stories and portrayed their characters as they are coming from a similar world view and life experience. This absolutely is not always the case, but it is often enough to allow that to impact my reading choices.
That doesn’t mean that I am a staunch male author hater. I will read something if it looks appealing. I am always on the search for new favorite authors to add to my collection. I just haven’t found one that gets to me yet.
It is easy as a reader to think that when you open that book, you are starting with this blank space that the book fills completely. That the book will succeed or fail entirely on its own merits. That is great in theory, but theory and reality rarely ever travel along the same path. In this, the theory breaks because while the book may be a blank slate, the reader is not.
We each bring our own issues, experience and history onto that slate before we ever even glance at the cover. Our own well covered slate has us beginning to form thoughts and expectations on that first glance before the spine is even cracked. It is impossible to not let our slate color the slate of the book.
Our slates help us to form opinions and perceptions about what we are reading. It is what helps us to like characters, plot elements, settings, everything that make up that book. It is also what can make us dislike all those same things if they don’t fit into our personal version of the perceptions we form.
A book may connect on a seriously deep emotional level with a reader that has a personal experience that resonates with the subject in the book. While that same book may be incredibly unemotional to a reader that their own history doesn’t give them the background to create any kind of a bridge between them and the book to help them empathize. The second reader may still be able to enjoy the book, but they just won’t be able to connect in the same way or on such an emotional level.
As reader, I try to keep in mind what my own slate has written on it and attempt to understand how a person with a different history may view a story that I’m struggling to connect with. There are times when my imagination just isn’t good enough to stretch that far, but sometimes, I can get a different perspective on a story and understand it on a different level.
I find it fascinating to look at how differing perceptions form peoples opinions with regards to books. There are times when I’m floored after I’ve read a book that I thought was stunningly written only to then go read how other people have reviewed that book and find out that they completely hated it. A lot of times, if the review is well articulated, I can totally understand how someone might feel that way. I many not agree, but I can understand it. Other times, I’m on the opposite end of that concept when I’ve found a book I really didn’t like that is heavily praised.
Understanding how my perceptions influence my opinion has also helped me learn to articulate what or why I like or dislike certain aspects of the books I’ve read. It still isn’t always easy, not by a long shot, but it does help. Eh… sometimes.
After having written several reviews now, I realized that my previous rating system just didn’t quite cut it. Apparently it is one thing to think, internally, that there aren’t that many slots to categorize books, but another entirely to be able to clearly define those slots when writing about them. There are way more gray areas than I’d believed. Because of that, I’ve decided to adjust my ratings to a more standardized form that, hopefully, will make it a bit more clear.
My previous rating scale and reasoning can be found here. The new one isn’t a whole lot different, but it gives a bit more wiggle room that I felt I needed and didn’t have with some of my previous reviews. I won’t go back and change any existing reviews, but all new reviews will follow the new system.
A 5 star rating is reserved for my absolute favorites. I will absolutely be willing to spend the money to buy this book. This type of book is one that I will read multiple times, has such great content that I find myself so absorbed in the story that I’m incredibly disappointed when the book is over because I want more. The books that receive a 5 star review will be few and far in between because there just aren’t that many books that speak to me on that level.
4 star books are really good; excellent story/characters/world, but just miss the mark of falling into the favorites category. There is a good chance that I might read it again if I didn’t have something more interesting in my To Read list. It would definitely be something I’d recommend to others if asked.
3 star books are good, but not great. I enjoyed it, didn’t feel like it was a waste of time, but more than likely won’t take the time to read it again. They may have mostly decent writing, but often one major aspect seems weak or not well thought out or fully developed. I might read other books by the same author or in the series when I’m looking for something to read, but don’t have something more anticipated or interesting on my list. A lot of the time they are the type that seem like a replay of every other storyline out there. Cookie cutter writers eventually fall into this category, no matter how much I may have liked the first book or so. There are only so many times you can read the same story with only slightly different characters/scenarios before it gets really old.
2 star books are books that I didn’t particularly like. They are usually books that just weren’t for me, now matter how well written they may have been. Sometimes quality of writing alone will drop a book down to the 2 level, even if the story concept was good. There are only so many flaws a story can have before a reader loses interest.
1 star ratings are not ratings that I hand out often. These are those that I seriously question every single person involved in the process because that book was BAD. Bad story, horrid characters, no way was there any editing involved, or any combination of those things. An awful lot of times, these are the books that I may get a few chapters into and cannot force myself to attempt to plow through another sentence and are absolute and total garbage. I really hate using the last term for these books as I don’t like to slam anyone, but there really just isn’t a nice way of saying it when a book is actually that bad.
A great romance novel is something that tugs at the heartstrings, yanks on the readers emotions and draws them into the story. It is an escape and, in some cases, a hope that honestly great romances do happen. There are several things that a story needs to have to become a truly great romance novel, essentials that really help connect a reader to the story emotionally. Those essentials are some of the primary aspects that make a real romantic relationship work.
Yes, authors often use secrets and the withholding of information as a way to create tension and drama. As long as you give a strong reason why that honesty isn’t happening, then it can work. It can also work if it is one of the struggles the characters are dealing with and trying to do better at. If it is not present just because, as a whim or because the character is ignorant, oblivious or just completely insecure, you had better do a really good job writing a story that makes those issues work or the integrity of your characters can fall apart and end up seeming stupid or week.
Trust ties in closely with honesty. If your characters can’t be honest with each other, then the trust is going to be really hard to work with. Absolutely, trust should be earned. When you don’t take the time to build and develop that in the relationship, then it doesn’t come across as believable. The characters are either blindly trusting, which can make them seem painfully naive, or they just never trust at all. When you have a character that is so completely unwilling to build that trust or is unbending in their distrust of their romantic partner, no matter the actions or honesty the other has displayed, then that makes your character seem harsh, cold, uncaring or even something of fool.
What is good for the goose is good for the gander. All parties in the romantic relationship should have the same rights and expectations of behavior, otherwise there is a huge double standard allowed and things can get really ugly. If one part of the romantic couple gets upset about the behavior of the other, don’t have that one turn around and do the exact same thing and not allow the same kind of fallout to be addressed or dealt with. All parties should have to compromise and develop or the relationship isn’t balanced and won’t appear very realistic. You cannot have only one person expected to or be making all the changes or taking the difficult steps or having to deal with the difficult decisions. That just isn’t that realistic. Even though we are buying into the fantasy of the story, it still needs to feel possible.
Any good story is going to have some conflict, even in a really lighthearted story. You cannot expect it to all be rainbows and rose petals and utterly, completely perfect. On the other hand, the flawed characters, have to have growth as well. In their situations, their personalities, even how they view the world around them or their belief in how relationships should work. If you get to the end of the book and the characters are still the same as they started, then part of the point of the story got missed. That goes for all characters, that whole equality/balance/compromise thing.
If the issues and conflicts within the relationship are the exact same ones throughout the entire book with zero progress toward improvement or change, the reader is going to get frustrated really quickly. In a real relationship, if one or another of those in that relationship continue to keep making the same mistakes over and over, or continue to hurt their partner over and over again, eventually that relationship is going to break. If it doesn’t, it isn’t a healthy relationship and that kind of defeats the purpose of a good romance. You also cannot have it be the same throughout the entire book to only have the characters have a miraculous epiphany in the last chapter and all those problems are magically resolved. It does take a bit of time to deal with and go through those changes.
Make them flawed. Make them imperfect. Allow them to make mistakes, even big ones. Allow them to feel insecure. Allow them to be a little broken. Give them great personality. Allow them to have emotions. Just don’t make them so much of any one of those things that they are unlikable or that their attitudes and behaviors are just painfully unappealing.
If your character is confident in who they are on page 50, do not make them suddenly, for no reason, feel differently on page 120. Don’t have your characters hate each other in the beginning, then have absolutely nothing change at all but they suddenly have the hots for each other. Have motivations and reasons for the personalities you create and make sure they work together. Back up any changes with specific and clear reasons. It doesn’t work for someone to be a total badass, but is unable to function without someone holding their hand or cries at the drop of a hat. A character can be conflicted, that is fine. Don’t make them seem like they have multiple personalities, unless you are actually writing a multiple personality character.
There are always exceptions. Different scenarios can allow for these aspects to not necessarily all be prominent in a story or allow for exceptions, but you have to have some hint of them. Either that or have a great reason to allow for those exceptions to make a story work well. Sure, you can produce an okay or even a good romantic story without some of those aspects, but chances are you aren’t going to be able to pull off that really great one without them on some levels. The biggest thing that is going to make the difference between okay and great is believability. You don’t want your reader laughing at your characters like they are that bad horror movie actor that does that obviously stupid thing that everyone knows is going to get them killed (because, come on! Everyone knows you don’t look under the bed).
Besides providing entertainment, romantic stories can also often be a launching platform for how expectations begin to form in younger generations. It is something of a peeve of mine for a romance novel to set an extremely bad example of what is okay in a relationship. No, not all romance stories showcase healthy relationships. The ones that are well written make sure it is pretty clear that the story is about a relationship that isn’t healthy. Others that aren’t so well written can send the wrong message altogether, allowing impressionable or inexperienced readers to get the idea that some incredibly unhealthy, even harmful behaviors, attitudes and actions are actually okay. Not much will drop a book onto my Don’t Like list faster than books that don’t make it clear that certain behaviors are unhealthy or worse, promote those ideas and behaviors.
Safe sex falls into that category. I’ve mentioned it before. There is zero excuse for an author to not include safe sex practices in their writing, with a very, very few exceptions like authentic representation of a time period and the rare time when a story warrants it. Most authors are good about making it clear when an unsafe sex situation has occurred that the characters should have been safe/made better choices, but not all authors do this. I personally respect the author and characters a lot more when they take the time to be responsible.
Oh, and for me? A real romance has a happy ending. That can be approached from a lot of different ways. It doesn’t always mean a traditional Cinderella, happily ever after. As long as, in the end, the characters are happier in themselves and/or their relationships or better off overall then it qualifies.
As of right now, my current book count stands at 112 new and 27 re-reads. Seems that I am continuing with my theme of re-reading some of my favorites this year. This month, I re-read one of my all time favorite series, Michelle Sagara’s Chronicles of Elantra. I probably should have read House War (another favorite) first as that is the series that has the next book out (May5), but I’m sure that is going to be the next on the re-read list.
I’m doing a lot of re-reading because I am STILL struggling to find new authors to read that I love. Heck, I’d be thrilled with even just one at this point. Sure, I’ve found a couple of new ones that I like, but I don’t love them and that is getting frustrating. I have grabbed more new books lately that don’t just jump out and grab me when I read the synopsis on the off chance that something will spark when I read the actual book. That hasn’t quite worked yet, but I’m still holding out hope.
Something I realized the other day is that I’m not actually writing very many reviews. While I think it is probably impossible for me to write a review for every single book I read (my current average is about a book and a half a day, so that would be a bit much), I do think I should probably be writing up at least a few more than I currently am. I didn’t realize how difficult it might be to write up something on a book that isn’t either awesome or awful and since I haven’t found much in the first category and try exceptionally hard to avoid the second, that doesn’t leave me with all that much to write about, so I’m going to work on that for next month.
April 7th brings the new release in the Jane Yellowrock series, Dark Heir. I’ve got that one on pre-order and cannot wait to get it. The 7th is also the release day for Diana Rowland‘s latest in the Kara Gillian Series, Vengeance of the Demon. This one I don’t have on my To Buy list, but I am on the waiting list through the library. So glad that I know I’ve got some things on my upcoming reading list to really look forward to.
There are several things that I believe will either make or break a book with tiny variations along the way being the only difference between a good book and one that is awesome. Or… along the other spectrum, awful.
I categorize books based mainly on whether or not I’d be willing to spend the money on the book, or as is most often the case as I read the majority of books from the library, if it is worth re-reading (which that list has become incredibly narrow as of late). This type of book is one that I will read multiple times, has such great content that I find myself so absorbed in the story that I’m so disappointed when the book is over because I want more. These are the books that are in my all time favorites list. There is a big divide between this level and the next because there just aren’t many at all that will land in the top.
The next level is where a book is really good; excellent story/characters/world, but isn’t quite unique or special enough for me to want to take the time out of reading new material to want to read it again. It would definitely be something I’d recommend to others if asked.
Editing is something of a peeve of mine and can actually make the difference between a good/mid-level book and a great book. For me, if the story is excellent and I’m reading along and there is a glaring editing mistake, it trips me up. I have to stop, usually re-read to try and figure out what was actually meant before I can move on. This disrupts the flow of a book and bugs me to no end. I don’t always know if those great books are just exceptionally well edited or if the story is just so amazing my mind skims over whatever mistakes are there, but the times it is noticeable can really effect where I place a book on my good/bad scale.
There will always be that mid-level book that is okay, but to me seems like a replay of every other storyline out there. It may have mostly decent writing, but often one major aspect seems weak or not well thought out or fully developed. I wouldn’t consider them a waste of time, but are right there on the border. Cookie cutter writers eventually fall into this category, no matter how much I may have liked the first book or so. There are only so many times you can read the same story with only slightly different characters/scenarios before it gets really old. This level also covers books that just weren’t for me, now matter how well written they may have been.
The last group of books are those that I seriously question every single person involved in the process because that book was BAD. Bad story, horrid characters, no way was there any editing involved, or any combination of those things. An awful lot of times, these are the books that I may get a few chapters into and cannot force myself to attempt to plow through another sentence and are absolute and total garbage.
It may seem that there is a huge gap between those last two, but there really isn’t. Most books that I’m not a huge fan of will fall in that second to last group. Just because I don’t necessarily like or enjoy it doesn’t make it a bad book.
I guess if I had to put a label or name on those levels, they would be Excellent/Favorite, Really Good, Mediocre/Didn’t Like, Garbage. Though I really hate using the last term for that label as I don’t like to slam anyone, but there really just isn’t a nice way of saying it when a book is actually that bad.
A few years ago, I got an e-reader for my birthday. It didn’t take long to discover the convenience of the instant download when purchasing or that I could easily get books for it through my local library. Lots and lots of books. Books that I didn’t have to wait on or go out somewhere and get. If I wanted to read it, it was right there. Instantaneously. That set off an interesting chain of events and a huge new addiction.
I’ve always been a big reader, but had this weird obsession of needing to own what I read. I didn’t like going to the library to check books out because I hated having to give back a book that I loved. When you do not have an unlimited book budget and you have a weird quirk about needing to own what you read, it forces you to become really picky. Because of that, I really didn’t read a lot of books, maybe 5 or 10 a year depending on what my favorite authors at the time were releasing.
When I got my first tablet, it helped me to let go of that little obsession (that whole “you can have it RIGHT NOW” thing kind of began to overrule that little quirk), but also opened the door to me reading all kinds of books. This lead me to find lots of new authors that I loved. It also lead me to a whole lot that not only did I not love, but absolutely couldn’t stand. I learned an awful lot about what I did and did not like in a book or an author.
For the last few years and through over 1200 books (no that is not a typo, I did say “huge addition”), I’ve found myself wanting to get some thoughts out of my head about what I’ve read. There is only so much my poor hubby can sit and listen to about books, especially when he is so not a reader himself. I figured this was a much better option than driving him crazy on a regular basis.